
Saathiyo
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date November 16, 1977
-
Sectors International Relations
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 3
Company Description
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence business that establishes open-source big language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the company in 2023 and functions as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 design offers actions comparable to other modern large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to limit the capability of these two countries to establish innovative AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share cost to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more recognized rivals has actually been described as “overthrowing AI”, [8] making up “the very first chance at what is emerging as a global AI area race”, [11] and ushering in “a new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, enabling its code to be easily available for usage, modification, watching, and creating files for building functions. [13] The company supposedly vigorously hires young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer system science field to diversify its models’ understanding and abilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading because the 2007-2008 financial crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, implying its code is easily offered for use, modification, and viewing. This consists of authorization to access and utilize the source code, along with style files, for developing functions. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip restrictions on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer began a synthetic basic intelligence laboratory devoted to research establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital companies were unwilling in supplying funding as it was not likely that it would have the ability to generate an exit in a brief period of time. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong performance for a low cost, DeepSeek became referred to as the catalyst for China’s AI design cost war. It was rapidly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the cost of their AI designs to contend with the business. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it was profitable compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this also enables its technology to avoid the most stringent provisions of China’s AI policies, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to comply with the government’s controls on information. [3]
DeepSeek’s employing choices target technical capabilities instead of work experience, leading to a lot of brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires individuals with no computer system science background to assist its innovation comprehend other topics and understanding locations, including being able to generate poetry and perform well on the notoriously hard Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available free of charge to both scientists and commercial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and responsible downstream use” for the model itself. [21]
They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline data. This produced the Instruct designs.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was established to compete with other LLMs available at the time. The paper declared benchmark results higher than most open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]
The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat variations of the 2 Base designs was also released simultaneously, acquired by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared comparable performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are always queried, and “routed professionals” that might not be. They discovered this to assist with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some specialists can become extremely counted on, while other experts may be seldom utilized, wasting parameters. Attempting to balance the experts so that they are equally utilized then triggers professionals to reproduce the very same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to find out core capabilities that are often used, and let the routed specialists to find out the peripheral capabilities that are rarely used. [28]
In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The reward model was a process benefit model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This reward design was then utilized to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit design was continually updated during training to prevent reward hacking. This resulted in the RL design.
V2
In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL using GRPO in 2 phases. The first phase was trained to solve math and coding problems. This phase used 1 reward model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second stage was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow rules. This stage used 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety reward models were trained on human preference information. The rule-based reward model was by hand configured. All qualified benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They went with 2-staged RL, due to the fact that they discovered that RL on thinking data had “unique attributes” different from RL on basic information. For instance, RL on reasoning might improve over more training steps. [31]
The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and trained likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “further research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 models were substantially modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of professionals (MoE) variant formerly published in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related direction data, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math problems was computed by comparing with the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was created by a benefit design trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the unit tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It consisted of a higher ratio of math and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (math, programming, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, easy question answering) information. Reasoning information was produced by “expert designs”. Non-reasoning information was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by humans. – The “professional designs” were trained by beginning with an undefined base design, then SFT on both information, and synthetic information created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to show and validate throughout thinking. Then the specialist designs were RL utilizing an unspecified reward function.
– Each professional design was trained to create simply synthetic thinking information in one particular domain (mathematics, programming, logic).
– Expert designs were used, rather of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad formatting, and extreme length”.
4. Model-based benefit designs were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information consisting of both final benefit and chain-of-thought causing the final benefit. The reward design produced reward signals for both concerns with objective but free-form responses, and questions without objective responses (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based benefit was computed for mathematics problems with a final response (put in a box), and for shows issues by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek team performed extensive low-level engineering to achieve efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, requiring special GEMM routines to accumulate precisely. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the interaction latency by overlapping extensively computation and interaction, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU interaction. They lowered interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise machine each professional was on in order to prevent certain machines being queried more frequently than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became accessible via DeepSeek’s API, along with through a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible inference, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial data generated by R1. [47]
A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant initially thinks about the thinking procedure in the mind and then supplies the user with the answer. The reasoning process and answer are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here respond to here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “generally” of 2 types (other types were not specified): precision benefits and format benefits. Accuracy reward was examining whether a boxed answer is proper (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was inspecting whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has problems with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to attend to these problems and further enhance thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL process as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency reward” to encourage it to react monolingually. This produced an internal model not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the created reasoning had a wrong last response, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and reactions
DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly responds to concerns, solves reasoning problems and composes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests used by American AI business. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 uses considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require only about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta spent constructing its latest AI innovation. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive performance at reasonably minimal cost has actually been recognized as possibly challenging the global supremacy of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was supposedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]
DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively applauded DeepSeek as a national asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with professionals and asked him to offer viewpoints and tips on a draft for of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has highlighted potential limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, that include export constraints on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models consequently “triggered market turmoil” [57] and triggered shares in major worldwide technology business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 design, had caused tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined responses to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “super excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed suspicion of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the model in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its new user registration to contact number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack interrupted the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have actually observed that the official application programming user interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers located in China, utilizes censorship systems for topics that are considered politically sensitive for the government of China. For instance, the design declines to address questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially create a response, but then deletes it soon later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The integrated censorship mechanisms and constraints can only be removed to a restricted level in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and specified: “We securely oppose any type of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are devoted to attaining the complete reunification of the motherland through serene means.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers were able to deceive DeepSeek into providing particular responses to some of these topics by requesting in its response to swap particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and privacy
Some professionals fear that the government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms state “We keep the info we gather in secure servers located in individuals’s Republic of China … We might collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you provide to our model and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired post reports this as security concerns. [80] In reaction, the Italian information protection authority is looking for extra information on DeepSeek’s collection and use of individual data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually begun a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government prohibited the use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s use of personal details. [83]
Artificial intelligence market in China.
Notes
^ a b c The number of heads does not equal the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required choosing “Deep Think enabled”, and every user could utilize it only 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI design DeepSeek thrills scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive models and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI facilities costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you should know”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to plunge?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI design overcame US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design exceeds Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design appears to be among the finest ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek poses an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI model breakthrough highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek sparks global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely impressive”: “We must take the developments out of China really, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘impressive'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests huge Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek momentarily limited brand-new sign-ups, citing ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it does not appreciate free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI poses powerful cyber, information personal privacy risks”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator seeks details from DeepSeek on data defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates impact of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.